The BORN Ontario team has been involved in diverse projects, resulting in numerous scientific publications. This page provides a sample of the scientific output from some of these research studies:

Maternal Newborn Dashboard evaluation

BORN Ontario developed the Maternal Newborn Dashboard, an electronic audit and feedback system for all maternal-newborn hospitals in Ontario.

The BORN group led a provincial mixed-methods evaluation of the Maternal Newborn Dashboard, to assess the effect of the system on clinical practice improvement on 6 key performance indicators across Ontario. To date, there have been three publications from this evaluation:

A mixed methods evaluation of the maternal dashboard in Ontario: dashboard attributes contextual factors & facilitators and barriers to use: a study protocol

Implementation Science 2016; 11:59

doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0427-1

This is the published protocol for the mixed-methods evaluation of the BORN Ontario Maternal newborn Dashboard, and details the objectives and planned methods for the study.

Effect of a population-level performance dashboard intervention on maternal-newborn outcomes: an interrupted time series study

BMJ Quality & Safety 2018;27(6):425-436

doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007361

This study used an interrupted time series analysis to assess the effect of the BORN Maternal Newborn Dashboard 2.5 years after implementation in Ontario on six key performance indicators. Results showed an improvement in four out of six key performance indicators at the provincial level.

Use of a maternal newborn audit and feedback system in Ontario: A collective case study

BMJ Quality & Safety 2019; e-pub ahead of print


This study used a qualitative case study design with over 100 people at 14 diverse Ontario hospitals to learn about their experiences using the BORN Maternal Newborn Dashboard for clinical practice change in their settings. The identified barriers and facilitators to using the Dashboard suggest that additional interventions may be needed to further optimize the effect of audit and feedback.

MOREOB evaluation

Since 2002, most maternal-newborn hospitals in Ontario have participated in the MOREOB (Managing Obstetrical Risk Efficiently) program, an obstetrical safety program for health care providers that aims to create a culture of safety and improve maternal and newborn outcomes in obstetric units.

BORN Ontario led a provincial mixed-methods evaluation of the MOREOB program, to assess the effect of the program on maternal and newborn adverse outcomes, health care provider knowledge, unit culture, and to learn about health care provider experiences participating in and implementing the program. To date, there have been two publications from this evaluation:

Effect of implementation of the MOREOB program on adverse maternal and neonatal birth outcomes in Ontario, Canada: A retrospective cohort study

BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth 2019; 19:151

doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2296-5

This retrospective cohort study of 67 Ontario hospitals that implemented the MOREOB program between 2002 and 2012, demonstrated no reduction in the incidence of maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes.

A mixed-methods evaluation of the MOREOB program in Ontario hospitals: Participant knowledge, organizational culture, and experiences

BMC Health Services Research. 2019; in press

doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4224-9

This study used surveys and semi-structured interviews with health care providers and administrators who participated in the MOREOB program at 26 Ontario hospitals since 2013, to learn about changes in obstetrical knowledge, unit culture, and experiences with the program. The MOREOB program contributed to increasing health care provider knowledge and unit culture, and participants reported positive experiences in the program.

Birth Centre evaluation

In 2014, two new birth centres funded by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care were opened in Ottawa and Toronto, providing individuals choosing midwifery care with a third option (in addition to home and hospital) for place of birth. These centres continue to provide prenatal and intrapartum services.

BORN Ontario led the evaluation of the first year of these two new birth centers to assess the maternal and newborn outcomes and to learn about the experiences of clients and health care providers. To date, there have been two publications from this evaluation:


Outcomes for the first year of Ontario's Birth Center demonstration project

Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 2018;63(5):532-540

doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12884

This publication presents outcome data on the 495 individuals who accessed the two birth centres in the first year of operations, including data on obstetrical interventions used and maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality rates. Results suggest that birth centres are a safe option for low-risk individuals.

The integration of Ontario Birth Centres into existing maternal newborn services – care provider experiences

Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 2018;63(5):541-549

doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12883

This publication presents the results of focus groups with health care providers in the two cities where the new birth centres opened, to learn about their perceptions of the integration of the centres and their experiences with transports and transfers of care. Results suggest that with the use of a collaborative approach, the centres were well integrated in the existing maternal newborn health system.

Prenatal Screening Ontario (PSO)

Prenatal Screening Ontario (PSO) was created as a provincial resource to enhance access to prenatal screening, provide education supports, facilitate ongoing quality assurance and support the incorporation of evolving technology or screening options.  For more information about PSO activities, or to access educational or ordering resources, please visit the PSO website.

Key to the work of the program is the understanding of how screening is utilized and performs in our population, and PSO has produced a number of publications to widely disseminate our findings. Selected publications are below:

Cytogenetic outcomes following a failed cell-free DNA screen: a population-based retrospective cohort study of 35,146 singleton pregnancies.

AJOG 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.01.007 

The main goal of this study was to assess the association between a failed cell-free DNA test and common aneuploidies. The study showed that cell-free DNA screening test failures are relatively common. Although repeat testing improves the likelihood of an informative result, pregnancies with a failed cell-free DNA screen upon first attempt remain at increased risk for common autosomal aneuploidies, but not sex chromosome aneuploidies.

The impact of maternal and geographical factors on the uptake of NIPT: A retrospective cohort study

Prenat Diagn 2022; 42(13): 1594-1605; doi: 10.1002/pd.6257

The objectives of this study were to investigate recent trends in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) utilisation. The study found there was substantial variation in NIPT uptake between regions within the province. The highest uptake was found in urban areas, highest quintile of neighbourhood income and education, for those who were ≥40 years of age and had a history of previous aneuploidy, for those with a prenatal care visit in the first trimester, multiple pregnancy, multigravidity and body mass index within the normal range.

Performance of a universal prenatal screening program incorporating cell-free fetal DNA analysis in Ontario

CMAJ 2021;193(30):E1156-E1163; doi: 10.1503/cmaj.202456.

This study described the population-based performance of Ontario's prenatal screening program, which incorporates publicly funded cfDNA screening for specific indications, and the effect of cfDNA testing on the screening and diagnostic choices made by pregnant people. This publicly funded screening program showed robust performance, a substantial reduction in prenatal diagnostic testing and that pregnant people exercise autonomy in their choices about prenatal screening and diagnosis.

Trends in the use of prenatal testing services for fetal aneuploidy in Ontario: a descriptive study

CMAJ Open 2018;6(4):E436-E444; doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20180046

This study examined the trends in use of different modalities of prenatal screening (multiple-marker screening, cell-free DNA screening [cfDNA]) and diagnostic testing before and after the implementation of provincial funding for cfDNA screening in Ontario. Results demonstrated that since the implementation of publicly funded cfDNA, cfDNA screening increased and prenatal diagnostic testing decreased.

Enhanced first trimester screening for trisomy 21 with contingent cell-free fetal DNA: a comparative performance and cost analysis

JOGC 2017;39(9):742-749; doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.01.025

This study compared four prenatal screening strategies to integrate cell-free DNA screening into a publicly funded prenatal screening algorithm. The results suggest that using enhanced first trimester screening (eFTS) with contingent cfDNA screening following a positive eFTS result is a cost-effective system that doesn't compromise screening performance.

Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register (CARTR) Plus

Since 2013, the Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register (CARTR) Plus database has been used to monitor trends, performance, and outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment in Canada. IVF treatment cycles and other data from Ontario fertility clinics is linked to the BORN database to allow even greater insight into important areas of reproductive health. Selected publications resulting from this work are below:

Comparing maternal serum screening markers among IVF and spontaneous conceptions in Ontario through registry data

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Canada 2018;40(12):1608-1617

doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.02.024

This study included two years of data from all Ontario fertility clinics and prenatal screening data to compare maternal serum screening markers in in vitro fertilization (IVF) conceptions to spontaneous conceptions. The results suggest that alternate adjustment factors are needed to increase the accuracy of prenatal screening results in IVF conceptions.